After reading posts and comments floating around the Delaware Blogosphere the past week or so, I have become utterly convinced that many people (bloggers, commenters) are drinking some serious Kool-Aide.
As I have mentioned on other blogs and on this very blog, it is the responsibility of Americans nation wide to make rational, educated, and responsible choices when the time comes to vote one way or another in November. It is fine to vote for John McCain or Barack Obama or Bob Barr or Donald Duck if and only if you have taken the time to first listen to, then consider, and finally draw conclusions about all candidates running. No longer can I accept the pandering, lying, and partisan bullshit that goes on at places like DelawarePolitics and DelawareLiberal among others.
I had a pretty intense conversation over some drinks with my best friend this afternoon, and we came to the conclusion that it is utterly unacceptable to attatch character issues to candidates. By pandering to the masses, talking heads have effectively turned the Presidential race into a refferendum on race, gender, elitism, POW’s, community organizers, oratorical skills, and countless other character issues. These issues are just a means to realate your life experiences to that of a candidates. And although you may share certain characteristics or qualitites with a candidate that doesn’t mean you both have come to the same conclusion about these life experiences. Yes, Sarah Palin is a mother of five, however that doesn’t mean she needs to be at home all day like the lady down the street who has five pain in the ass kids.
No, the adjectives used to define these characteristics are false facades that allow the voters of America to remain uneducated about the issues facing the country. The media has allowed the focus of the election to shift from issues to adjectives, and if the American public does not step up to correct this, we are going to face some serious issues down the road.
“How do we fix this?”
Well, one solution my friend and I came up with is to use a ground up approach to reporting on issues, and by ground up, I mean the local blogosphere.
My solution would be frequent roundtable discussions on Real Issues. As a Democrat, if I personally wanted to read something about how I already stand on an issue, I would go to DelawareLiberal. That is precisely the problem, though. No one wants to leave their box. No one wants to hear where the other side stands on an issue. They go to familliar settings and revel when they all agree with each other.
To combat this, I believe it is our duty and responsibility as Americans and Delawareans to present the public with rounded and well covered issues. If we have someone from DelawareLibertarian, Kavips, DelawarePolitics, DelawareWay, DelawareLiberal, and all the way around the blogosphere, available to discuss issues, not only will we better informed on our own convictions, we will better inform the public. It is not about the web traffic, it is about the substance, and unfourtunately the Delaware Blogosphere is lacking in the latter. Wouldn’t you be stronger in your convictions if you actually had to discuss and defend them rather than be told, “Yes, sir.”??
There is my challenge. Forget a blog convention. That is counter productive if you ask me. Forget Progressive Democrats or Progressive Conservatives. If you really want to see progression, strive for Progressive Americans, because in the end all we are and all we always have been are Americans, and to progess together is much more important than to fall divided.
Tags: Barack Obama, John McCain, delaware liberal, Delaware Blogs, delaware politics, America, delaware blogosphere, sarah palin, kavips, delaware way, delaware libertarian, pow, issues, democrat, republican
September 6, 2008 at 2:43 pm
I think your idealism is clouding your judgment. What you’ve written is all well and good, but how about those of us who really don’t give a damn and just want to give our readers something interesting, witty, off-the-cuff, and slightly offensive to read? Like I’ve said before, my site isn’t the place for “Real Issues.” If someone HAPPENS to learn something in the process of reading my site, cool. But I’m all about the entertainment value. People who read my site are those who are taking a break from their awful desk jobs and from their awful families. They don’t want to be bothered with issues. They want to read something light and stupid. Unfortunately, that’s how most of America is. I’m not saying that’s good or bad — it is what it is.
I’ve found myself these past few months creeping more into the “issues’ territory as I’ve written about school board, county council, and legislative meetings. But the issues always take a back seat; I have to be irreverent and humorous first. Issues second. If there isn’t a witty angle from which to present a story, then I generally don’t tell it. If I don’t enjoy writing something, then I don’t think my readers will enjoy reading it.
I appreciate your efforts, though. We need more young folk like you. I’d be all up for a meeting “on the issues.” Just so long as I can insert a fart joke or two into the proceedings!
September 6, 2008 at 4:03 pm
“I think your idealism is clouding your judgment.”
Possibly.
I agree and completely understand that many bloggers/writers do what they do for precisely what you said: “to give our readers something interesting, witty, off-the-cuff, and slightly offensive to read.” And I don’t think Down With Absolutes is one of the sites I am ranting about here.
And it is truly ironic that the day after my friend and I talked about having round table discussions with people on all different sides of issues, especially on radio, you all go and announce the formation of delawaretalkradio.com. I was honestly thrilled to fucking death to see that.
My post was really a condemnation of the bullshit that gets thrown out on these partisan websites as truth. If some of the local bloggers could be asked to be held accountable by their peers for what they post as truth and news, maybe we as a community would become more intelligent and gain a better ability to sort out the bullshit in our already crazy world.
Thanks for the comment mike, and stop by more often!
September 7, 2008 at 1:04 pm
Call It, you make a valid point. One that might come to fruition after the election. Fair or not, I’ve been clear… I am not taking my eye off the ball. Does that mean I agree with Obama on everything? Of course not, and I will hold his feet to the fire AFTER he wins. I learned that lesson with Gore and Kerry. Go ahead, slam me!
BTW, my real issue Healthcare thread received only five comments. What’s that tell you?
September 8, 2008 at 7:45 pm
Pandora,
No slamming needed. I just feel that if Obama is the better candidate then his record and policies would indicate it. Your post about Palin was great, because it points out what I have been saying: What is the need for all of these character attacks and spin bullshit? The candidates policies should speak for themselves. And I believe it is our duty, to present said policies and to debate them.
Yes, I saw the healthcare thread and Im pissed I didn’t comment on it and chose to defend Sara Palin instead. It really speaks volumes…
September 19, 2008 at 8:38 am
I try to have a substantive blog. Thanks for including me contributions.